The investigation into the alleged murder conspiracy involving Siya Goyal and Chetan Chaudhary has revealed new details, according to the police. Investigators claim the two not only attempted to arrange a contract killing but also prepared themselves for possible questioning by watching online videos about police interrogations.
According to the police, Siya Goyal and Chetan Chaudhary allegedly contacted a contract killer with the intention of having Ketan murdered. However, investigators say the alleged plan did not go as intended because the individual approached for the crime reportedly refused to carry it out.
Police claim that after the alleged murder-for-hire attempt failed, the accused continued with their plans in other ways. Investigators are examining the sequence of events and gathering evidence to determine the exact roles played by each person involved.
One of the most striking claims made by the police concerns the duo's online activity before their arrest. According to investigators, Siya and Chetan allegedly spent nearly two hours watching Japanese videos that discussed how to remain calm during police questioning, maintain controlled body language, and respond effectively during interrogations.
Police believe the videos were intended to help the accused prepare for potential questioning if the investigation reached them. Investigators are examining the browsing history and other digital evidence as part of the ongoing probe to determine whether the videos were viewed with that specific purpose.
The alleged online preparation has attracted significant public attention, highlighting how digital content can become part of criminal investigations. Authorities often examine internet searches, browsing history, and electronic devices to establish timelines, intentions, and possible premeditation in serious criminal cases.
Police have stated that the investigation remains ongoing and that they are continuing to collect forensic, digital, and testimonial evidence. Officials are also working to verify every aspect of the case before filing the final chargesheet.
The case has generated widespread discussion due to the unusual allegation that the accused attempted to prepare themselves psychologically for police interrogation by studying online videos. However, investigators have emphasized that these findings form only one part of the broader investigation.
It is important to note that the information released so far reflects the police's allegations and investigative findings. The accused have the right to defend themselves, and all allegations remain subject to judicial scrutiny. Their guilt or innocence will ultimately be determined by the appropriate court based on the evidence presented during legal proceedings.
As the investigation progresses, authorities are expected to reveal further details regarding the alleged conspiracy and the evidence collected. Until the legal process is complete, the claims made by investigators should be treated as allegations rather than established facts.
