The Art of Living Foundation, led by spiritual leader Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, has strongly denied allegations of land encroachment and accused a Member of Legislative Council (MLC), without naming the individual, of instigation and harassment. The organization clarified that its activities are lawful and transparent, dismissing claims of illegal occupation as baseless.
Allegations and Response
The controversy emerged after reports suggested that The Art of Living had encroached upon government land near its Bengaluru ashram. In its official statement, the foundation categorically rejected these allegations, calling them “false and misleading.” It emphasized that all land holdings are legally acquired and documented, and that the accusations were politically motivated.
The organization further alleged that one MLC was behind the instigation, attempting to malign its reputation through harassment and misinformation. While the name was not disclosed, the foundation maintained that the matter was being exaggerated to create unnecessary controversy.
Foundation’s Stand
The Art of Living highlighted its contributions to society, including large-scale humanitarian projects, environmental initiatives, and spiritual programs. It stated that such allegations undermine the work of thousands of volunteers engaged in service activities. The foundation reiterated that it has always respected the law and will continue to cooperate with authorities to clear any doubts.
Sri Sri Ravi Shankar himself has not directly commented on the issue but is expected to address the matter in upcoming public interactions. The organization’s leadership has assured followers that the truth will prevail and that their mission of peace and service remains unaffected.
Broader Context
Land disputes involving spiritual organizations are not uncommon in India, often arising from political rivalries or local administrative conflicts. The Art of Living’s denial comes at a time when it is expanding its global outreach, with new centers and programs being launched worldwide. Supporters argue that the allegations are an attempt to tarnish the image of a movement that has positively impacted millions.
